[one-users] TEMPLATE_NAME as a USER TEMPLATE attribute in 4.0-beta1

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

Now that we have the 'onetemplate rename' operation, we can't rely on
TEMPLATE_NAME to do anything in drivers or upper layer applications. Maybe
we should delete this attribute, and leave only TEMPLATE_ID?

Regards

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization
www.OpenNebula.org | cmartin at opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula<http://twitter.com/opennebula><cmartin at opennebula.org>


On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Ruben S. Montero
<rsmontero at opennebula.org>wrote:

> Indeed, now fixed in one4.0
>
> THANKS!
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Simon Boulet <simon at nostalgeek.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it normal that TEMPLATE_NAME is set as a USER TEMPLATE attribute?
> >
> > Shouldn't it be in the regular VM TEMPLATE attribute (just like
> TEMPLATE_ID
> > is)?
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opennebula.org
> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruben S. Montero, PhD
> Project co-Lead and Chief Architect
> OpenNebula - The Open Source Solution for Data Center Virtualization
> www.OpenNebula.org | rsmontero at opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20130405/65dd404d/attachment-0002.htm>