[one-users] openvswitch and brcompat in the post3.3 world

[Shankhadeep Shome]

Well in your defense, brcompat isn't the solution to using openvswitch to
it's full potential anyways. I think it's better to create the wrapper
scripts to call ovsctl directly or whatever it's called now.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:09 AM, christopher barry <cbarry at rjmetrics.com>wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:05 -0400, christopher barry wrote:
> > greetings,
> >
> > what's the plan for using openvswitch in the future, without requiring
> > brcompat?
> >
> > while I can compile openvswitch master for use with my 3.5 kernel, the
> > brcompat has issues:
> >
> > modprobe brcompat
> > FATAL: Error inserting brcompat
> > (/lib/modules/3.5.1/kernel/net/openvswitch/brcompat.ko): Unknown symbol
> > in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
> >
> > dmesg: brcompat: Unknown symbol ovs_dp_ioctl_hook (err 0)
> >
> > ...and it seems as though the idea is to move away from bridge
> > compatibility anyway.
> >
> > I have made this error known upstream to the ovs developers, but have
> > not heard back as of yet.
> >
> > but back to the longer term plan, is it just some scripts that need to
> > change to use ovs without brcompat?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > -C
>
> So, this was totally my fault.
>
> The bridge module was loaded, and this caused the error, brcompat is
> loaded fine now, so please excuse the noise...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20120917/a56ecbd9/attachment-0002.htm>