[one-users] some vmware performance suggestion for openenbula3.4

[Tino Vazquez]

Hi,

comments inline,

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:57 AM, 张光鹏 <zhanggp at neusoft.com> wrote:

> **
> Hi, all
> I have realized the opennebula3.4 integration of the work through the opennebula3.4
> of vmware driver guidance,but i have some suggestions :
> 1. onevm delete one-60
> openenbula3.4 delete vm action: openenbula3.4 will
> delete  virtual machine's image files , but will not delete the virtual
> machine's info from vCenter's dataList;
> Although it won't do function of the use of impact , but we will left some
> data like"one-60(孤立的)"，when to delete operation more and more
> ，dirty data is more and more。
> So，i suggest openenbula delete vCenter‘s vm info when it delete vm。And，you
> can't use "virsh -c esx://xxx" this way ,but with the "virsh -c vpx://xx"
> way, because "esx" way
> can't find the vm'info. You just nedd to add one command to undefine the
> deleted vm from vCenter.
>
OpenNebula just uses vCenter for live migration purposes. If this is the
usual configuration of VMware, then we can think about housekeeping the
vCenter. What do you use vCenter for?


> 2. onevnet delete 1
> openenbula3.4 vnet action: I admit openbula do well to add a virtual
> dynamic network ，When I create a virtual machine, it will help me create a
> corresponding virtual port group
> using the specified vlan_id. And When I migrate a virtual machine, it will help
> me create another host virtual port group using the specified vlan_id.
> But When I delete this virtual network, virtual port group created will
> remain on the part of the host. So I suggest to delete this virtual
> network,
> the way to remove those host virtual port group.
> You just need to run some command like --delete-pg .It's very simple, but we
> will feel very complete, is not?
>

We've taken the decision of not erasing the port groups because we thought
that it doesn't affect performance (but it imposes a penalty on the delete
operation). Do you know if keeping them there hinders performance? If so,
we will erase them.


>
> The above comments are the problems encountered in the experiment, I hope
> that can help improve openenbula.
>

Thanks a lot for your feedback! This is the useful stuff that helps
OpenNebula to grow.

Regards,

-Tino


>
> Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------
>  张光鹏
> tel:  13718913184
> mail: zhanggp at neusoft.com
> 移动互联网事业部
>  东软集团股份有限公司
> http://www.neusoft.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
> accompanying attachment(s)
> is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be
> confidential and/or privileged of
> Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader
> of this communication is
> not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,
> storing, disclosure or copying
> is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this
> communication in error,please
> immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original
> message and all copies from
> your system. Thank you.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20120518/2ee1f1a3/attachment-0003.htm>