[one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

[Shankhadeep Shome]

Oh ok I do see reasonable numbers from time to time, I guess its the refresh


On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Shankhadeep Shome <shank15217 at gmail.com>wrote:

> yea kvm, ubuntu 12.04 for me as well with 3.8.1 but I swear I saw it
> before with older versions, I just didn't care enough to post.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Gary S. Cuozzo <gary at isgsoftware.net>wrote:
>
>> I see this also, using Ubuntu 12.04 with KVM, but if I hit the refresh it
>> goes to reasonable numbers.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Rodolfo Conte Brufatto" <rcbrufatto at gmail.com>
>> *To: *"André Monteiro" <andre.monteir at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *"users" <users at lists.opennebula.org>
>> *Sent: *Sunday, December 16, 2012 5:37:45 PM
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth
>>
>> Same here, using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM, André Monteiro <andre.monteir at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have this problem also, using KVM with SL6.3.
>>>
>>> --
>>> André Monteiro
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ricardo Duarte <rjtd21 at hotmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have this problem too, with KVM and CentOS  6.3, using the default
>>>> monitoring intervals.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ricardo
>>>>
>>>> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:54:59 +0100
>>>> > From: jfontan at opennebula.org
>>>> > To: shank15217 at gmail.com
>>>> > CC: users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>> > Subject: Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Those values seem pretty high, indeed. What is the hypervisor you are
>>>> using?
>>>> >
>>>> > I've just made a test with kvm. Set the monitoring interval to 30 and
>>>> > fired up a download in a vm limited to 10Kb/s. The values are pretty
>>>> > similar to the 10Kb/s limit.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Shankhadeep Shome
>>>> > <shank15217 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > The bandwidth reported in Sunstone cant be right.. I see 15GB/s dl
>>>> and
>>>> > > 27GB/s upload at th emoment and this is usually the case, sometimes
>>>> larger
>>>> > > numbers or smaller too. In any case doesn't seem even close to
>>>> accurate.
>>>> > > Anybody else see this behavior? I'm using the dummy net driver.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Shankhadeep
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > Users mailing list
>>>> > > Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>> > > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Javier Fontán Muiños
>>>> > Project Engineer
>>>> > OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization
>>>> > www.OpenNebula.org | jfontan at opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Users mailing list
>>>> > Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Have you tried turning it off and on again?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20121216/3ce30398/attachment-0002.htm>