[one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

Shankhadeep Shome shank15217 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 17:40:19 PST 2012


yea kvm, ubuntu 12.04 for me as well with 3.8.1 but I swear I saw it before
with older versions, I just didn't care enough to post.


On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Gary S. Cuozzo <gary at isgsoftware.net>wrote:

> I see this also, using Ubuntu 12.04 with KVM, but if I hit the refresh it
> goes to reasonable numbers.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Rodolfo Conte Brufatto" <rcbrufatto at gmail.com>
> *To: *"André Monteiro" <andre.monteir at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"users" <users at lists.opennebula.org>
> *Sent: *Sunday, December 16, 2012 5:37:45 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth
>
> Same here, using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM, André Monteiro <andre.monteir at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have this problem also, using KVM with SL6.3.
>>
>> --
>> André Monteiro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ricardo Duarte <rjtd21 at hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have this problem too, with KVM and CentOS  6.3, using the default
>>> monitoring intervals.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:54:59 +0100
>>> > From: jfontan at opennebula.org
>>> > To: shank15217 at gmail.com
>>> > CC: users at lists.opennebula.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Those values seem pretty high, indeed. What is the hypervisor you are
>>> using?
>>> >
>>> > I've just made a test with kvm. Set the monitoring interval to 30 and
>>> > fired up a download in a vm limited to 10Kb/s. The values are pretty
>>> > similar to the 10Kb/s limit.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Shankhadeep Shome
>>> > <shank15217 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > The bandwidth reported in Sunstone cant be right.. I see 15GB/s dl
>>> and
>>> > > 27GB/s upload at th emoment and this is usually the case, sometimes
>>> larger
>>> > > numbers or smaller too. In any case doesn't seem even close to
>>> accurate.
>>> > > Anybody else see this behavior? I'm using the dummy net driver.
>>> > >
>>> > > Shankhadeep
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Users mailing list
>>> > > Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>> > > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Javier Fontán Muiños
>>> > Project Engineer
>>> > OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization
>>> > www.OpenNebula.org | jfontan at opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Users mailing list
>>> > Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Have you tried turning it off and on again?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20121216/8776407a/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list