[one-users] Little help with first building cloud

[matheus tor4]

Hello guys,

I'm here again.

I choosed to use .deb package instalation instead build source code.

But, when I execute  $ sudo dpkg -i opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb
I get this error message:

Desempacotando opennebula (de opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: erro processando opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb (--install):
 erro estabelecendo posse de '/var/lib/one/remotes.dpkg-new': Opera��o n�o
permitida
Processando gatilhos para ureadahead ...
Processando gatilhos para man-db ...
Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de:
 opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb

(Sorry, it is in brazilian portuguese)

Summarizing  we got a error like:

dpkg: error processing opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb (- install):
  error setting ownership of '/ var / lib / one / remotes.dpkg-new':
Operation not allowed

I'm not so sure, but I believe that occurs because the shared file system.
As all the files have a different owner, the front-end cannot write
anything in this directory.

So, the question is:

Have I wich to share only the directory /var/lib/one/images, or the whole
/var/lib/one?
Does exist a file to put permissions of the shared directory?

Very thanks guys.

Best regards

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:59 AM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everybody.
>
> Very thanks for the help until now.
>
> I'm using this thread to put all my doubts ok?
> So, if anyone wish follow me in this adventure "Building my first cloud",
> only have to look this tread to see my status at the moment.
>
> My doubt now is:
>
> Wich is better?
> - Use .deb to install the openNebula in the hosts and in the front-end.
> Remember I'm using a Ubuntu Desktop 10.04 (32bits) as Front End and using
> Ubuntu Server 11.04 (64 bits) as Hosts.
> - Building and compile source, because is more safer, and it is more close
> to procedure shown on OpenNebula official documentation.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards,
>
> Matheus Torquato
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Fabian Wenk <fabian at wenks.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hello Matheus
>>
>>
>> On 27.11.2011 17:49, matheus tor4 wrote:
>>
>>> At the time I'm using the second strategy: Using a Core2Duo as a
>>> Front-End
>>> and release all
>>> resources of the server to be use by cloud.
>>> I choose this option because it is more close to the proposal of official
>>> OpenNebula Documentation.
>>> I hope it works now!
>>>
>>> So I use one of my servers (With VT) as a Image Repository too.
>>>
>>
>> This is up to you, but I would keep the image repository on the front end
>> or eventually on the second system without VT. So you could use the two
>> systems with VT as two identical cluster nodes.
>>
>>
>>  And now I have a little more question:
>>>
>>> With a NFS server configured. I have the Image Repository sharing its
>>> directory /var/lib/one. My doubt is:
>>> - Have I to insert the shared directory in the file /etc/fstab on all my
>>> nodes? So the node already have this directory avaiable when the machine
>>> starts.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, and also on the front end.
>>
>>
>>  - Or Haven't I to do this? Does the directory only be mount when it is
>>> necessary? (sudo mount ...)
>>>
>>
>> It needs to be already mounted when OpenNebula will deploy a VM.
>>
>>
>>  And, if I edit the /etc/fstab, Do I have to do this in the node
>>> ImageRepository+Cluster at the same time? I hope not, because the
>>> directory
>>> is on the machine
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure about OpenNebula 3.0, but with 2.2 the image repository and
>> also the VM_DIR folder need to be mounted in the same path as they are on
>> the front end.
>>
>>
>>
>> bye
>> Fabian
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/**listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.**org<http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20111130/89f97598/attachment-0002.htm>