[one-users] Incomplete information from hosts polling (VMWare ESXi 4.1 an OpenNebula 2.0.1)

Luigi Fortunati luigi.fortunati at gmail.com
Fri Feb 4 01:50:36 PST 2011


I can post the VM template content on monday. However, as far as I remember,
the vm template was really simple:
NAME="Debian"
VCPU= 2
MEMORY=1024
DISK=[IMAGE="Debian5-i386"]
OS=[ARCH=i686]

The VMs can boot and run, I can log on console through vSphere Client on the
newly created VMs.

I noticed that if you don't declare the number on VCPU the VM doesn't get
scheduled on a cluster node. This option seems mandatory but I didn't find
any mention about it on the documentation.
Another thing that seems mandatory is declaring the cpu architecture as
i686, otherwise OpenNebula will return error when writing the deployment.0
file.


On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ruben S. Montero <rubensm at dacya.ucm.es>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am not sure this is related to the VMware monitoring... Can you send the
> VM Templates?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ruben
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Luigi Fortunati <luigi.fortunati at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I noticed a serious problem about the usage of VMWare ESXi 4.1 and
>> OpenNebula 2.0.1.
>> I'm actually using the VMWare driver addon which can be found on the
>> opennebula website (ver. 1.0) and libvirt (ver. 0.8.7).
>> It happens that OpenNebula can't get information about the usage of
>> resources on the cluster nodes.
>> By running 2 VM (each one requires 2 VCPU and 1 GB of memory) and
>> executing some commands I get this output.
>>
>> oneadmin at custom2:~/src$ onehost list
>>   ID NAME              CLUSTER  RVM   TCPU   FCPU   ACPU    TMEM    FMEM
>> STAT
>>    2 custom7.sns.it    default    0    200    200    200      2G      0K
>>  off
>>    1 custom6.sns.it    default    2    200    200    200      2G      0K
>>   on
>> oneadmin at custom2:~/src$ onehost show 1
>> HOST 1 INFORMATION
>>
>> ID                    : 1
>> NAME                  : custom6.sns.it
>> CLUSTER               : default
>> STATE                 : MONITORED
>> IM_MAD                : im_vmware
>> VM_MAD                : vmm_vmware
>> TM_MAD                : tm_vmware
>>
>> HOST SHARES
>>
>> MAX MEM               : 2096460
>> USED MEM (REAL)       : 0
>> USED MEM (ALLOCATED)  : 0
>> MAX CPU               : 200
>> USED CPU (REAL)       : 0
>> USED CPU (ALLOCATED)  : 0
>> RUNNING VMS           : 2
>>
>> MONITORING INFORMATION
>>
>> CPUSPEED=1992
>> HYPERVISOR=vmware
>> TOTALCPU=200
>> TOTALMEMORY=2096460
>>
>> As you can see OpenNebula is unable to get correct information about the
>> usage of resources on the cluster nodes.
>> As these informations are used by the VM scheduler, OpenNebula is unable
>> to schedule the VM correctly.
>> I tried to create several VM and all of them were placed on the same host
>> even if the latter was unable to satisfy the resource requirements of all
>> the VMs.
>> I think that this problem is strongly related to libvirt as OpenNebula use
>> it to recover information about hosts and vm.
>>
>> Do you get the same behavior? Do you know if there is a way to solve this
>> big issue?
>>
>> --
>> Luigi Fortunati
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Ruben Santiago Montero
> Associate Professor (Profesor Titular), Complutense University of Madrid
>
> URL: http://dsa-research.org/doku.php?id=people:ruben
> Weblog: http://blog.dsa-research.org/?author=7
>



-- 
Luigi Fortunati
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20110204/f9d95f93/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list