[one-users] Little help with first building cloud
matheus tor4
matheusifal at gmail.com
Sun Dec 4 14:16:00 PST 2011
can Anyone help me?!
Very thanks.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:58 PM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com> wrote:
> And this message below:
>
> [VirtualMachinePoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call.
>
> Its sounds familiar, but I dont get until the moment the right solution.
>
> Any hints?
>
> Cheers.
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:37 PM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Did it!
>>
>> Need only change the standart shell of user.
>>
>> $ sudo usermod -s /bin/bash oneadmin
>>
>> Solved this question.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:24 PM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I'm here again guys.
>>>
>>> Now I have a little small doubt.
>>>
>>> After I make the login without password between Front-end and my node.
>>> I see this out:
>>>
>>> *oneadmin at PacsOnCloud-FrontEnd:~$ ssh oneadmin@<my-ip>
>>> Welcome to Ubuntu 11.04 (GNU/Linux 2.6.38-8-server x86_64)
>>>
>>> * Documentation: http://www.ubuntu.com/server/doc
>>>
>>> System information as of Fri Dec 2 19:49:46 BRT 2011
>>>
>>> System load: 0.0 Processes: 85
>>> Usage of /: 0.5% of 226.04GB Users logged in: 1
>>> Memory usage: 1% IP address for eth0: <my-ip>
>>> Swap usage: 0% IP address for virbr0: 192.168.122.1
>>>
>>> Graph this data and manage this system at
>>> https://landscape.canonical.com/
>>> New release 'oneiric' available.
>>> Run 'do-release-upgrade' to upgrade to it.
>>>
>>> Last login: Fri Dec 2 19:49:00 2011 from 172.17.5.134
>>> $**
>>> *
>>> If we look closely, we see that the prompt for oneadmin remote only has a
>>> * $ *prefix.
>>> It is look like a limited prompt. I can do nothing with this kind of
>>> prompt. ls, cd, cat, nothing works.
>>> Only the command 'exit' works fine.
>>>
>>> Is that correct?
>>>
>>> Any hints?
>>>
>>> Thank you so much.
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:31 PM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Problem solved!!!
>>>>
>>>> Look this http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/994
>>>>
>>>> After the change run $ sudo dpkg --configure opennebula.
>>>>
>>>> Then voilà, I finished the installation.
>>>>
>>>> I go now to basic configuration!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:32 AM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I got a lot of erros when I use front-end separate of image repository.
>>>>> Front-end needs write on shared directory /var/lib/one, and the
>>>>> ownership of the folder belongs to local user.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I use only two servers to build the Cloud.
>>>>>
>>>>> One as Front-end + Image Repository + Node
>>>>> And other as Node.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, I'm in serious trouble now.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I attempted install the .deb package a got this error:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Selecionando pacote previamente n�o selecionado opennebula.
>>>>> (Lendo banco de dados ... 71268 ficheiros e direct�rios actualmente
>>>>> instalados.)
>>>>> Desempacotando opennebula (de opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb) ...
>>>>> Configurando opennebula (3.0.0-1) ...
>>>>> Alerta: o diret�rio pessoal que voc� especificou /var/lib/one j�
>>>>> existe.
>>>>> Adicionando usu�rio de sistema `oneadmin' (UID 107) ...
>>>>> Adicionando novo grupo `oneadmin' (GID 118) ...
>>>>> Adicionando novo usu�rio `oneadmin' (UID 107) ao grupo `oneadmin' ...
>>>>> Diret�rio home /var/lib/one j� existe. N�o copiando de /etc/skel
>>>>> adduser: Alerta: O diret�rio pessoal `/var/lib/one' n�o pertence ao
>>>>> usu�rio que voc� est� criando.
>>>>> Generating public/private rsa key pair.
>>>>> Your identification has been saved in /var/lib/one/.ssh/id_rsa.
>>>>> Your public key has been saved in /var/lib/one/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.
>>>>> The key fingerprint is:
>>>>> 79:b8:f2:7b:9c:a8:2c:40:d0:b5:23:ef:62:ae:51:d5
>>>>> oneadmin at PacsOnCloud-FrontEnd
>>>>> The key's randomart image is:
>>>>> +--[ RSA 2048]----+
>>>>> | . .. |
>>>>> |. . o |
>>>>> | .. + E |
>>>>> | .+ . o |
>>>>> | .. . S . |
>>>>> | ... o |
>>>>> |. o.. . .o . |
>>>>> | + ... o. + |
>>>>> |... .o.oo |
>>>>> +-----------------+
>>>>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/opennebula.postinst: 43: cannot create
>>>>> /.one/one_auth: Directory nonexistent
>>>>> dpkg: erro processando opennebula (--install):
>>>>> sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de
>>>>> sa�da de erro 2
>>>>> Processando gatilhos para ureadahead ...
>>>>> Processando gatilhos para man-db ...
>>>>> Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de:
>>>>> opennebula
>>>>>
>>>>> (It is on Brazilian Portuguese, I'm sorry!)
>>>>>
>>>>> The most important message is:
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> */var/lib/dpkg/info/opennebula.postinst: 43: cannot create
>>>>> /.one/one_auth: Directory nonexistent*
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> Google says nothing for me.
>>>>> Already install all the dependecies packages, using this steps:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ sudo apt-get install libmysqlclient16 libsqlite3-ruby genisoimage
>>>>> ruby g++ scons libsqlite3-dev libxml2-dev libssl-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> And I downloaded this packages bellow, and installed manually. When I
>>>>> try to install the opennebula .deb package at the first time It ask for
>>>>> these packages.
>>>>>
>>>>> $ sudo dpkg -i libxmlrpc-core-c3_1.06.27-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb
>>>>> $ sudo dpkg -i libxmlrpc-c3_1.06.27-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I don't know what to do to solve this question.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it better install by building source?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone get this error message before?
>>>>> Is it about permissions?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm counting on you guys.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very thanks for all the help;
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matheus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:56 PM, davood ghatreh <
>>>>> davood.gh2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've worked on Centos and have no idea about Debian based
>>>>>> installation, but I think you need to share /var/lib/one, because there are
>>>>>> some other files/folders than images which are being used. for example,
>>>>>> /var/lib/one/.one/ is the path to authentication files, which servers
>>>>>> should see in a shared storage model to login without being asked for
>>>>>> password.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Davood
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:48 AM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm here again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I choosed to use .deb package instalation instead build source code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But, when I execute $ sudo dpkg -i opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb
>>>>>>> I get this error message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Desempacotando opennebula (de opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb) ...
>>>>>>> dpkg: erro processando opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb (--install):
>>>>>>> erro estabelecendo posse de '/var/lib/one/remotes.dpkg-new':
>>>>>>> Opera��o n�o permitida
>>>>>>> Processando gatilhos para ureadahead ...
>>>>>>> Processando gatilhos para man-db ...
>>>>>>> Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de:
>>>>>>> opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Sorry, it is in brazilian portuguese)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Summarizing we got a error like:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dpkg: error processing opennebula_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb (- install):
>>>>>>> error setting ownership of '/ var / lib / one / remotes.dpkg-new':
>>>>>>> Operation not allowed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not so sure, but I believe that occurs because the shared file
>>>>>>> system. As all the files have a different owner, the front-end cannot write
>>>>>>> anything in this directory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, the question is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have I wich to share only the directory /var/lib/one/images, or the
>>>>>>> whole /var/lib/one?
>>>>>>> Does exist a file to put permissions of the shared directory?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very thanks guys.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:59 AM, matheus tor4 <matheusifal at gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello everybody.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Very thanks for the help until now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm using this thread to put all my doubts ok?
>>>>>>>> So, if anyone wish follow me in this adventure "Building my first
>>>>>>>> cloud", only have to look this tread to see my status at the moment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My doubt now is:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wich is better?
>>>>>>>> - Use .deb to install the openNebula in the hosts and in the
>>>>>>>> front-end. Remember I'm using a Ubuntu Desktop 10.04 (32bits) as Front End
>>>>>>>> and using Ubuntu Server 11.04 (64 bits) as Hosts.
>>>>>>>> - Building and compile source, because is more safer, and it is
>>>>>>>> more close to procedure shown on OpenNebula official documentation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matheus Torquato
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Fabian Wenk <fabian at wenks.ch>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Matheus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 27.11.2011 17:49, matheus tor4 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At the time I'm using the second strategy: Using a Core2Duo as a
>>>>>>>>>> Front-End
>>>>>>>>>> and release all
>>>>>>>>>> resources of the server to be use by cloud.
>>>>>>>>>> I choose this option because it is more close to the proposal of
>>>>>>>>>> official
>>>>>>>>>> OpenNebula Documentation.
>>>>>>>>>> I hope it works now!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I use one of my servers (With VT) as a Image Repository too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is up to you, but I would keep the image repository on the
>>>>>>>>> front end or eventually on the second system without VT. So you could use
>>>>>>>>> the two systems with VT as two identical cluster nodes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And now I have a little more question:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> With a NFS server configured. I have the Image Repository sharing
>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>> directory /var/lib/one. My doubt is:
>>>>>>>>>> - Have I to insert the shared directory in the file /etc/fstab on
>>>>>>>>>> all my
>>>>>>>>>> nodes? So the node already have this directory avaiable when the
>>>>>>>>>> machine
>>>>>>>>>> starts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, and also on the front end.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Or Haven't I to do this? Does the directory only be mount when
>>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>>> necessary? (sudo mount ...)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It needs to be already mounted when OpenNebula will deploy a VM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And, if I edit the /etc/fstab, Do I have to do this in the node
>>>>>>>>>> ImageRepository+Cluster at the same time? I hope not, because the
>>>>>>>>>> directory
>>>>>>>>>> is on the machine
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not sure about OpenNebula 3.0, but with 2.2 the image
>>>>>>>>> repository and also the VM_DIR folder need to be mounted in the same path
>>>>>>>>> as they are on the front end.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bye
>>>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/**listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.**org<http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>>>>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20111204/9681be37/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list