[one-users] Problem with ONE 1.4 and Xen 3.2
Nikola Milutinovic
n.milutinovic at levi9.com
Thu Dec 31 01:58:24 PST 2009
On 30.12.2009 17:41, Nikola Milutinovic wrote:
> On 30.12.2009 16:13, Nikola Milutinovic wrote:
>>
>> Wed Dec 30 15:45:02 2009 [HOST][D]: Discovered Hosts (enabled): 0
>> Wed Dec 30 15:45:02 2009 [VM][D]: Pending virtual machines : 33
>> Wed Dec 30 15:45:02 2009 [RANK][W]: No rank defined for VM
>> Wed Dec 30 15:45:02 2009 [SCHED][I]: Select hosts
>> PRI HID HSID
>> -------------------
>> Virtual Machine: 33
>
> The clue here is the first line, 0 enabled hosts.
>
> Turns out that, since ONE relies on SSH access to monitored hosts, it
> is *very* sensitive to any "dirt" in the output. If you have a Banner
> or Message-of-theDay, it will definitely confuse ONE into thinking
> there is something wrong with the host. Turning both of those off
> solved the problem.
Actually, a miss.
That line meant "list of enabled hosts: ID=0". At this point I do not
quite understand what is going on. Why is the VM left in pending state?
I can force a VM deploy of that VM on the Xen host, which goes its way.
Could it be due to some memory misinterpretation?
oneadmin at vadmin:/srv/cloud/images/xen$ onehost list
ID NAME RVM TCPU FCPU ACPU *TMEM* FMEM STAT
0 xen1.gc.com 0 800 800 800 4192256 *131072* on
oneadmin at vadmin:/srv/cloud/images/xen$ onehost show 0
HOST 0 INFORMATION
ID : 0
NAME : xen1.gc.com
STATE : MONITORED
IM_MAD : im_xen
VM_MAD : vmm_xen
TM_MAD : tm_nfs
HOST SHARES
*MAX MEM : 4192256
USED MEM (REAL) : 4061184*
USED MEM (ALLOCATED) : 0
MAX CPU : 800
USED CPU (REAL) : 0
USED CPU (ALLOCATED) : 0
RUNNING VMS : 0
MONITORING INFORMATION
ARCH=x86_64
CPUSPEED=1600
FREECPU=800
*FREEMEMORY=131072*
HOSTNAME=xen.gc.com
HYPERVISOR=xen
MODELNAME=Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5310 @ 1.60GHz
NETRX=0
NETTX=0
TOTALCPU=800
TOTALMEMORY=4192256
USEDCPU=0
USEDMEMORY=4061184
I mean, this is normal for Xen, it gives all available memory to Dom0
and Dom0 will take that memory and give it to the VM, I've seen messages
in xend.log stating "baloon driver reducing memory of Dom0". Should I
manually reduce the memory available to Dom0?
Nix.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Nikola Milutinovic
Sr Java Developer
Levi9 Global Sourcing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Jan van Goyenkade 8, 1075 HP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
( +31 (0) 20 7547900 ext 2056
( +381 (0) 21 4895800 ext 2056
È +381 (0) 64 2202824
* n.milutinovic at Levi9.com <mailto:n.milutinovic at Levi9.com>
^ Skype: nikola.milutinovic
ü www.levi9.com <http://www.levi9.com/>
Chamber of commerce Levi9 Global Sourcing BV: 34221951
Chamber of commerce Levi9 Global Sourcing Benelux BV: 34224746
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not (one of) the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments
permanently without retaining a copy. Any review, disclosure, copying,
distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
e-mail by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The services of Levi9 are exclusively subject to its general terms and
conditions. These general terms and conditions can be found on
www.levi9.com <http://www.levi9.com/> and a copy will be promptly
submitted to you on your request and free of charge.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20091231/63765471/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list