[one-users] ebtables hook script for kvm hosts

Gavin netmatters at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 10:39:09 PDT 2009


Hi Ruben,

Thanks very much for the prompt response and am happy to hear that a
KVM ebtables hook script is on it's way.

I'm even happier to hear that KVM via OpenNebula will have the same
feature set as the established Xen hypervisor.

I'm busy setting up what should hopefully become fairly large
OpenNebula installation for a local tier 1 ISP, I've used Xen quite
extensively up until now, and I can say that it does the job really
well, apart from a few distribution/application specific annoyances.

The major Linux distributions seem to be favouring KVM these days and
I can agree with a lot of their motivations, so for this project I
have decided to deploy KVM.

Thanks again for your help and looking forward to the upcoming release(s).

Regards,
Gavin

2009/8/31 Ruben S. Montero <rubensm at dacya.ucm.es>:
> Hi Gavin,
>
> The KVM hook is on its way. The 1.4 Beta lacks some features that will
> be present in the stable release (like the ebtables hook for KVM). In
> a few days we will upload the KVM script so you can try it.
>
> There should not be any difference between Xen and KVM, and both of
> them support all the OpenNebula features. Any functionality gap is due
> to the Beta state of 1.4 version an not due to any preference in the
> underlying hypervisor technology.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ruben
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Gavin<netmatters at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> In the following documentation an example of using ebtables with Xen
>> is presented:-
>>
>> http://www.opennebula.org/doku.php?id=documentation:rel1.4:nm
>>
>> According to the guide, a script is provided for Xen, but 'It can be
>> easily modified to do the same with KVM/Libvirt'.
>>
>> Now for the life of me I cannot find the kvm equivalent for xm domid
>> or xm network-list.
>>
>> When I try to list the networks on a kvm host using virsh net-list,
>> all that shows up is the 'default', not any of the networks that are
>> actually configured and working on the running vm's:-
>>
>> root at node02:~# virsh list
>> Connecting to uri: qemu:///system
>>  Id Name                 State
>> ----------------------------------
>>  12 one-123              running
>>  13 one-124              running
>>  14 one-125              running
>>  15 one-126              running
>>
>> root at node02:~# ping 192.168.108.101
>> PING 192.168.108.101 (192.168.108.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.108.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=5.27 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.108.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.130 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.108.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.122 ms
>>
>> root at node02:~# virsh net-list
>> Connecting to uri: qemu:///system
>> Name                 State      Autostart
>> -----------------------------------------
>> default              active     yes
>>
>> Is anyone using ebtables with kvm, any suggestions ??
>>
>> Is kvm the way to go still because it's starting to look more and more
>> like Xen is still the platform of choice ??
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Gavin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
>  Dr. Ruben Santiago Montero
>  Associate Professor
>  Distributed System Architecture Group (http://dsa-research.org)
>
>  URL:    http://dsa-research.org/doku.php?id=people:ruben
>  Weblog: http://blog.dsa-research.org/?author=7
>
>  GridWay, http://www.gridway.org
>  OpenNebula, http://www.opennebula.org
> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
>


More information about the Users mailing list