<div dir="ltr">Thanks for the patch!!! this will be consider for the next release<div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Vladislav Gorbunov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vadikgo@gmail.com" target="_blank">vadikgo@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I make the path for iotune support:<br>
<a href="http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2530" target="_blank">http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2530</a><br>
<br>
You can download x64 rpm with iotune support (need only /usr/bin/oned)<br>
for CentOS 6.4 from<br>
<a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2296931/rpm/iotune/opennebula-server-4.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm" target="_blank">https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2296931/rpm/iotune/opennebula-server-4.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm</a><br>
<br>
2013/11/18 Stefan Kooman <<a href="mailto:stefan@bit.nl">stefan@bit.nl</a>>:<br>
<div><div class="h5">> Dear list,<br>
><br>
> Recently I've been playing with OpenNebula on Ubuntu Saucy (13.10). It<br>
> comes with libvirt-bin version 1.1.1 and qemu 1.5. One of the cool<br>
> things libvirtd / qemu are able to do now is "block io throttling", or<br>
> iotune as libvirt calls it. You can now define min, max, total<br>
> KBytes/Sec for read, write and total, as wel as for IOPS/Sec. I would<br>
> like to have support for this in OpenNebula vm templates just like there<br>
> is for CPU (cputune). It would be nice to able to set a total maximum<br>
> IOPS / bandwitch for a specific user/group, just like cpu, mem, images,<br>
> #vm's, etc. (and have strict enforcement).<br>
><br>
> Use cases:<br>
><br>
> - prevent denial of service of virtual machines consuming too much IOPS<br>
> / bandwith (io starvation, storage link saturation)<br>
> - be able to guarantee (minimal) disk IO performance. In combination with "per<br>
> user system datastores (ONE 4.4)" you can choose the right disk type<br>
> to satisfy latency needs.<br>
><br>
> What do you think?<br>
><br>
> Gr. Stefan<br>
><br>
> P.s. with something like vdc-nebula in place [1], the need to restrict IO<br>
> will be much less then in traditional io settings (very cool project<br>
> indeed).<br>
><br>
> [1]: <a href="http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=5408" target="_blank">http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=5408</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> | BIT BV <a href="http://www.bit.nl/" target="_blank">http://www.bit.nl/</a> Kamer van Koophandel 09090351<br>
> | GPG: 0xD14839C6 <a href="tel:%2B31%20318%20648%20688" value="+31318648688">+31 318 648 688</a> / <a href="mailto:info@bit.nl">info@bit.nl</a><br>
><br>
</div></div>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)<br>
><br>
> iF4EAREIAAYFAlKJKw8ACgkQTyGgYdFIOcYyUQD/c7p9+j3k0fCz2ScFusMJO1Sj<br>
> yKK6uDbIUphItfAqIvcBAIFvWIxdr9QpRHcYAdVDSFDUUC3MHtzBp7gudQ27ch/J<br>
> =Oh0f<br>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org">Users@lists.opennebula.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org" target="_blank">http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org">Users@lists.opennebula.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org" target="_blank">http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div><div>-- <br></div></div>Ruben S. Montero, PhD<br>Project co-Lead and Chief Architect<div>OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple<br>
<a href="http://www.OpenNebula.org" target="_blank">www.OpenNebula.org</a> | <a href="mailto:rsmontero@opennebula.org" target="_blank">rsmontero@opennebula.org</a> | @OpenNebula</div></div>
</div>