<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body style='font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>Yes, that is possible. But as I said, all my images were all preallocated as I haven't created any image from sunstone.</p>
<p> </p>
<div>---<br />
<pre><span style="font-size: small; font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: helvetica; color: #000000;">Thanks,
Kenneth</span><br /><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: helvetica; color: #000000;">Apollo Global Corp.</span><br /></span></pre>
</div>
<p>On 12/12/2013 06:25 PM, Michael wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<pre>This doesn't appear to be the case, I've 2TB of images on Ceph and 380GB
data reported by Ceph (760G after replication). All of these Ceph images
were created through the Opennebula Sunstone template GUI.
-Michael
On 12/12/2013 09:11, Kenneth wrote:</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">I haven't tried creating a thin or thick provision in ceph rbd from scratch. So basically, I can say that a 100GB disk will consume 100GB RBD in ceph (of course it will be 200GB in ceph storage since ceph duplicates the disks by default).</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org">Users@lists.opennebula.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org">http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body></html>