<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>Hi Túlio,</div><div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>Actually, I think that's not the correct configuration. Each group of interfaces with the same VLAN tag should be nested under a different bridge, and that bridge should have the tagged ethX interface:</div>

<div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>onebr32</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>    eth0.32</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>    vnetX</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>    vnetY</div>

<div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>onebr64</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>   eth0.64</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>   vnetZ</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>   vnetZZ</div>

<div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>The problem is that you shouldn't use BRIDGE, but PHYSDEV (where PHYSDEV = "eth0")<br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>

cheers,</div><div class="gmail_extra" style>Jaime</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Jaime Melis<br>Project Engineer<br>OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing<br><a href="http://www.OpenNebula.org" target="_blank">www.OpenNebula.org</a> | <a href="mailto:jmelis@opennebula.org" target="_blank">jmelis@opennebula.org</a>
</div>