<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
It worked! After adding the following to the deployment descriptor:<br>
OS = [ arch = "x86_64" ]<br>
VM booted successfully. Please consider adding this information
explicitly into configuration documentation.<br>
<br>
Thank you!<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Alexander Fedulov<br>
<br>
On 20.01.2011 11:20, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTi=u2RA3LLHg=NFscMvtyFUBuRdi5wy+waHXy9EP@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Hi,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>OpenNebula 2.0.1 solves a bug with recent versions of libvirt
which requires the arch attrbute. This attribute is set per VM
in the OS section like OS = [ arch = "i686" ] or in
etc/vmm_kvm/vmm_ssh_kvm.conf</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>By default the driver defines i686 arch. May be you are using
x86_64 images...</div>
<div>Could you check this?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ruben </div>
<div>
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alexander Fedulov <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:alexander.fedulov@fokus.fraunhofer.de">alexander.fedulov@fokus.fraunhofer.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
I compiled the 2.0.1 version of open nebula on the same
machine, where the previous one (2.0) was installed and
performed correctly. I moved the old "one" to another
directory and replaced it with the new installation.
Everything seems to work fine just up to the moment when
the VM has to be booted.<br>
From the perspective of ON the VM is in "runn" state, but
it does not actually boot up. When using my own image of
Ubuntu (which works fine with 2.0 version) and connecting
via VNC I only see a black screen and an underline symbol
in the left upper corner. The old ttylinux image that I
have does not work as well, but the fresh downloaded one
does. I was wondering whether I should change something in
my images in order for them to work with 2.0.1? I am
pretty much lost, so many thanks for any hints in advance.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Alexander<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opennebula.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org"
target="_blank">http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
Dr. Ruben Santiago Montero<br>
Associate Professor (Profesor Titular), Complutense University
of Madrid<br>
<br>
URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://dsa-research.org/doku.php?id=people:ruben"
target="_blank">http://dsa-research.org/doku.php?id=people:ruben</a><br>
Weblog: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://blog.dsa-research.org/?author=7"
target="_blank">http://blog.dsa-research.org/?author=7</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>