<div dir="ltr">Hello Borja,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Borja Sotomayor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:borja@borjanet.com">borja@borjanet.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Alvaro,<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Yes, I have tried, and it looks very useful indeed. :)<br>
But I'm getting a "no route to host" problem when I use the xmlrpc library. I guess I have port 2633 closed in the node where ONE is working, but that's a requirement I cannot touch... Or may I be doing something wrong? Because there is of course connection between both hosts (I can ssh, etc) and ONE is working properly, so the server is up... Do you think I have a configuration problem?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Are you running oned and your client on different hosts? If so, if you are capable of running commands like "onevm submit" and "onevm deploy", the XMLRPC connection should be working fine, since those commands use the XMLRPC API. Please let us know, so we can figure out if it's a network problem (e.g., a firewall) or a specific problem with the Java API.</blockquote>
<div><br>I think it might be a firewall problem. I'll tell you what I've found. But yes, I'm running my client and oned in different hosts. And I can do onevm submit from oned host and ssh onevm submit from the other host. So I guess XMLRPC server it's working, but something prevents it access...<br>
I think I may have the port blocked, I'll tell you :)<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
By the way, I keep thinking that managing VM via its provided name, would be a very nice feature :)<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I'm not one of the ONE developers, but I seem to remember this idea has been discussed in the past. One way of making sure that your suggestion doesn't get lost in the mailing list is to create a Trac ticket with a feature request:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://trac.opennebula.org/newticket" target="_blank">http://trac.opennebula.org/newticket</a><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Ok, you're right. I'll see if the ticket exists and, if not, try to add a new one. Thank you for the suggestion :)<br>
Best regards,<br><br>Alvaro<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
Cheers!<br>
-- <br>
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::<br>
Borja Sotomayor, University of Chicago<br>
Ph.D. Student, Department of Computer Science<br>
Ryerson 257-C, 1100 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL<br>
Haizea: <a href="http://haizea.cs.uchicago.edu/" target="_blank">http://haizea.cs.uchicago.edu/</a><br>
BorjaNet: <a href="http://www.borjanet.com/" target="_blank">http://www.borjanet.com/</a><br>
ˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇ<br>
"Dis maschine vill run und run!"<br>
-- Kurt Gödel (on the Turing Machine)<br>
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Álvaro<br>
</div>