[one-users] "Official" Debian packages

[Daniel Dehennin]

Jaime Melis <jmelis at opennebula.systems> writes:

> Hi Alberto,
>
> I can confirm what Daniel said. We have no current plans of updating the
> offical Debian package of OpenNebula. Debian packaing guidelines are very
> strict and as Daniel mentioned it's a very big job.
>
> Daniel, I apologize, but somehow I was not aware of #3129. I will update
> the ticket now.

Thanks, I have one issue with OpenNebula branches.

I based my work on the 4.10 package[1] to compare the original package
content with mine.

Now, I would like to follow master and derive the packaging based on OpenNebula
version, but I have a lot of conflicts when I merge master into my
packaging branch.

The base idea is to have one packaging branch following OpenNebula
master branch.

On a new release, a “release dedicated” packaging branch is
derived from the master packaging branch to follow the OpenNebula release.

Should I rebase[2] all my branches on master directly and then follow
the OpenNebula releases or is there a path to merge master and one-4.10?


Hmm, writing the question seems to gives my answer, it looks like the
cherry-picking of master commits on the one-<version> branches are the
reasons of the merge conflicts.

Any hints?

Footnotes: 
[1]  http://downloads.opennebula.org/packages/opennebula-4.10.1/

[2]  so changing history

-- 
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6  2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 342 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20150217/a5062651/attachment.pgp>