[one-users] Sunstone Dashboard "Real Capcacity Usage"

Carlos Martín Sánchez cmartin at opennebula.org
Mon May 26 07:15:14 PDT 2014


Hi Stefan,

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Stefan Kooman <stefan at bit.nl> wrote:

> Quoting Stefan Kooman (stefan at bit.nl):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering what the math is behind the "Real Capcacity Usage" in
> > Sunstone for "Virtual Machines". I'm seeing a 29% CPU and 102% Memory as
> > Real Capacity Usage for VM's. The hosts have for CPU:
> >
> > 1790/6400 (28%) Allocated 611/6400 (28%) Real
> >
> > And for Memory:
> >
> > 217.5 GB / 755.8 GB (29%) Allocated 144.9 GB / 755.8 GB (19%) Real
> >
> > I don't understand how the Real Capcacity Usage for Hosts is calculated.
>
> I ment to say "I don't understand how the Real Capcacity Usage for
> Virtual Machines" is calculated.
>
> Gr. Stefan
>
> --
> | BIT BV  http://www.bit.nl/        Kamer van Koophandel 09090351
> | GPG: 0xD14839C6                   +31 318 648 688 / info at bit.nl
>

The VM real cpu and memory numbers are the values reported for the VM
hypervisor process. The same values are used for the individual VM ->
Capacity graphs, or under virtual machine monitoring in the onevm show
output.

We will probably change the dashboard for the 4.8, and we may remove these
real values, since they can be a bit confusing.

Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.opennebula.org/> | cmartin at opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula <http://twitter.com/opennebula>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20140526/83adeaa6/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list