[one-users] can user's RAM quota acount only running/active VMs?

[kiran ranjane]

+1 vote for this

Thanks

Kiran Ranjane


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Stefan Kooman <stefan at bit.nl> wrote:

> Quoting Carlos Martín Sánchez (cmartin at opennebula.org):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Liu, Guang Jun (Gene) <
> > Gene.Liu at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi there,
> > >
> > > Is there a way to config or twist OpenNebula so that quota management
> > > (e.g. RAM) counts resources of active VMs only?
> > >
> > > I found the quota management (RAM per user) counts all the VMs which
> > > created by a user. We found if the quota only counts the resources
> from the
> > > active VMs, that means more sense. E.g., I have 16RAM quota. I create
> one
> > > VM w/ 16G RAM. Then I save/stop my VM. The system should allow me to
> create
> > > another VM w/ 16G RAM if quota management counts only active VMs.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Gene
> > >
> >
> > There isn't a way to configure that. It would require to modify the core.
> >
> > But I think it makes sense. So I return the question to the community:
> > ¿Should we consider this change in the quota behaviour?
>
> I vote for this change. Your not actually consuming resources on the
> hypervisor(s) for not having running vm's ...
>
> Gr. Stefan
>
> --
> | BIT BV  http://www.bit.nl/        Kamer van Koophandel 09090351
> | GPG: 0xD14839C6                   +31 318 648 688 / info at bit.nl
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20140514/2819e760/attachment.htm>