[one-users] Sunstone redundant memcached setup

[Javier Fontan]

I've been checking the API of Rack sessions put I don't find a way to
do what you are proposing. I'll come back to this after I finish with
some bugs I have in my backlog.

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Stefan Kooman <stefan at bit.nl> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> If you have a setup consisting of more than one "front-end" server I
> think it would make sense to be able to specify more than one memcached
> server in sunstone. If for one reason or another a memcached server is
> not available anymore it can automatically try the next one configured
> (after $timeout value). Building this funtionality directly into
> sunstone gives you the benefit of "redundant" memcached servers without
> the need for cluster software taking care of this. If you let sunstone
> server A point to memcached server A (primary) and memached server B
> (secondary) and sunstone server B point to memcached server B (primary)
> and memcached server A (secondary) you've doubled the available
> memcached capacity during normal operations.
>
> Are there any reasons _not_ to use two different (active) memcached
> servers?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stefan
>
>
> --
> | BIT BV  http://www.bit.nl/        Kamer van Koophandel 09090351
> | GPG: 0xD14839C6                   +31 318 648 688 / info at bit.nl
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iF4EAREIAAYFAlKDR2AACgkQTyGgYdFIOcbOYgEAwR7aRoaPgUh8n+Wa9xjAoZrH
> mI9eGkdoq2mmOwalR74A/jtSqnUu3L9G6I8HbXsFcMUzk9jORtUb/1NcDsIjd6Pt
> =uirV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>



-- 
Javier Fontán Muiños
Developer
OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization
www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan