[one-users] "onevm saveas" compromised one.db

[Duverne, Cyrille]

Hello Carlos,

Thanks a lot,

If I understood well the upgrade guide, I have to go from 3.2 to 3.4
and to 3.4 to 3.6 ?
If so, I read that I have to shutdown or delete all active VMs, should
I just stop them ?

Thanks in advance
Cyrille

Lundi 10/09/2012 à 12:36 Carlos Martín Sánchez a écrit:

Hi,

Datastores were introduced in 3.4.. Unless there is a good reason not
to, I'd suggest you to upgrade to the latest 3.6 version.

Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center
Virtualizationwww.OpenNebula.org [1] | cmartin at opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula [2] [3]

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Duverne, Cyrille  wrote:

 Hello Carlos,

As you might have read it, i'm using ONE 3.2 packaged in Ubuntu 12.04.
onedatastore show isn't a supported command of this version... Or at
least I get a "command not found"

How could I retrieve this info from ?

Regards
CyD

Thanks in advance.
Cyrille

Cyrille Duverne
Blog : http://blog.cduverne.com
Twitter : @CydsWorld

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge"
Albert Einstein

Mercredi 05/09/2012 à 12:34 Carlos Martín Sánchez a écrit:

 Hi,

What I need to know are the DS_MAD and TM_MAD datastore drivers for
the system Datastore 0, and the Datastore where the images are
registered (I guess 'default', 1). You can get them using the
'onedatastore show' command.

Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization
www.OpenNebula.org [1] | cmartin at opennebula.org | @OpenNebula [2] [3]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Duverne, Cyrille  wrote:

 Hello Carlos,

Thanks for your quick answer.

I'm using KVM and my images are only clones...

Regards
Cyrille

Mardi 04/09/2012 à 15:14 Carlos Martín Sánchez a écrit: 

Hi,

I can't reproduce this behaviour.
I'm using the drivers -,shared for the system datastore; and fs,shared
for the default datastore. What drivers are you using? Are your images
persistent?

About the CLI-Sunstone commands consistency, both end calling the ruby
OCA and then the core, so they should always have the same  outcome.

Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center
Virtualizationwww.OpenNebula.org [1] | cmartin at opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula [2] [3]

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Duverne, Cyrille  wrote:

 Hello All,

I've faced a strange behaviour with Sunstone.

1/ I created a VM using Sunstone
2/ I modified the VM to be consistent with my new config
3/ I launched a "onevm saveas" directly from the Hypervisor
4/ I chmoded the image dor my current user
5/ The new image was ready after a shutdown of the VM
6/ I created a new VM using this new image
7/ modified it again
8/ Launched a "onevm saveas" with the same image name and the command
passed
9/ I found 2 images with the same name (different ownership) 
10/ The 2nd image has never been ready.
11/ I removed the most recent image
12/ The remaining image is compromised and can't be found on the disk
because pointing to a file that has been deleted in the process.

I know that a saveas command is available on sunstone but I'd like to
test the consistence between actions done via oneadmin in the CLI and
on Sunstone.

Have you ever experienced this ?

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula..org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org



Links:
------
[1] http://www.OpenNebula.org
[2] http://twitter.com/opennebula
[3] mailto:cmartin at opennebula.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20120913/b4001789/attachment-0001.htm>