[one-users] the synchronous problem between the cancel operation and tm_delete.sh for lxc driver

Simon Boulet simon at nostalgeek.com
Sun Dec 16 20:50:38 PST 2012


One note, however, it seems the only way for a user to cancel /delete a
Powered off VM is to issue a delete action. If we make the delete action
ADMIN-only, we would need to make the cancel action possible for VMs in
Poweroff state (currently not possible).

Simon


On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Simon Boulet <simon at nostalgeek.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Ruben S. Montero <rsmontero at opennebula.org
> > wrote:
>
>> This seems to be confusing, we are thinking of moving the delete
>> operation to the ADMIN set (so you need admin permissions to delete)
>> and so force users to use the safer cancel operation... Any thoughts?
>>
>
> Not a bad idea to restrict cancel action to the ADMIN. However, I still
> think the VMM cancel action should be executed first, before the TM delete
> action, and the TM delete should be executed last, independently of the VMM
> cancel success or failure.
>
> Simon
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20121216/b99f46ac/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list