[one-users] VM IP address not assigned as per the base network address mentioned in virtual network template

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

That behaviour is the right one, but it may not be the one you would
expect... this has been discussed recently in the list.

Check these threads:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg02782.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg02827.html

Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Major Contributor
OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing
www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.opennebula.org/> | cmartin at opennebula.org


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Koushik Annapureddy
<koushik1987 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Here is the virtual network template I have used
>
> NAME = "VM_LAN"
> TYPE = RANGED
> BRIDGE = br0
> NETWORK_ADDRESS = 192.168.2.25
> NETWORK_SIZE    = 50
> GATEWAY         = 192.168.2.3
>
> I would like to have IP address allocated to VM's which starts from
> 192.168.2.26 But when I launch a VM using Open Nebula it is assigning the ip
> 192.168.2.1 to the first VM and hence forth.
> In the VM I have used the same context script given along with opennebula
> source.
>
>  --
> Thanks
> Koushik Annapureddy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20110509/fbdf8a30/attachment-0002.htm>