[one-users] Network Context from v2 to v3: use NETWORK_ID instead of NAME

[Shi Jin]

Thank you.
Shi

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Ruben S. Montero <rubensm at dacya.ucm.es>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There have been some discussions about this in:
>
>  http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/653
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Ruben
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Shi Jin <jinzishuai at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> In ONE-2, we can use the vnet information in the form of [1]
>>
>> dns        = "$NETWORK[DNS, NAME=\"Public\"]"
>>
>> In ONE-3, it switched to a new format using NETWORK_ID instead [2]
>>
>> dns = "$NETWORK[DNS, NETWORK_ID=3]"
>>
>>
>> I wonder what is the reason for this change. At least, I would expect the
>> v2 way of using NAME should still work in addition to the new way of
>> specifying NETWORK_ID. Am I missing something?  Thanks a lot.
>>
>> Shi
>> References:
>>
>> [1] http://www.opennebula.org/documentation:rel2.2:cong
>> [2] http://www.opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.0:cong
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shi Jin, Ph.D.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Ruben Santiago Montero
> Associate Professor (Profesor Titular), Complutense University of Madrid
>
> URL: http://dsa-research.org/doku.php?id=people:ruben
> Weblog: http://blog.dsa-research.org/?author=7
>



-- 
Shi Jin, Ph.D.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20110629/f8df3be4/attachment-0003.htm>