[one-users] VMWare Server 2.0 and non-persistent images to minimize copy when deploying

Manish Sapariya manish at gslab.com
Mon Feb 28 22:31:47 PST 2011


Hi Tino,
Thanks for the inputs.

I did following, but could not deploy the VM.

===============
oneadmin at ubuntu:~$ onehost create esxserv1.gslab.com im_vmware 
vmm_vmware tm_dummy
   => Host created successfully

oneadmin at ubuntu:~$ cat vm1-np.template
NAME=VMWareVM
MEMORY=256
CPU=1

OS = [ ARCH = "i686" ]

NIC=[NETWORK="Public"]

DISK=[ source="[kpointstoreubuntu] MyVM_Image/MyVM.vmdk",
        target = "hda",
        clone="yes",
        save="no"
         ]

oneadmin at ubuntu:~$ onevm create vm1-np.template
oneadmin at ubuntu:~$ onevm deploy 35 5
  => deploy failed. The vm.log shows following error.
------
Tue Mar  1 01:25:37 2011 [DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE.
Tue Mar  1 01:25:37 2011 [LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG.
Tue Mar  1 01:25:37 2011 [TM][E]: prolog, error getting driver tm_dummy
Tue Mar  1 01:25:37 2011 [TM][E]: epilog_delete, error getting driver 
vmm_vmware. You may need to manually clean 
esxserv1.gslab.com:/src/cloud/one/var//35/images
Tue Mar  1 01:25:37 2011 [DiM][I]: New VM state is FAILED
------
================

Do I need to create my host any differently?
What does the error signify?

Thanks and Regards,
Manish


On 2/28/2011 8:21 PM, Tino Vazquez wrote:
> Hi Manish,
>
> You can avoid the copy of the image if you:
>
>   1) Use the dummy TM drivers
>   1) Stop using the image catalog, and input the SOURCE of the disks
> with the following format
>
>         [DATASTORE] relative/path/to/disk
>
> The path is relative wrt the DATASTORE.
>
> hope it helps,
>
> -Tino
>
> --
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, MSc
> OpenNebula Major Contributor
> www.OpenNebula.org | @tinova79
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Manish Sapariya<manish at gslab.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We have are using OpenNebula 1.4 using following kind of setup.
>> The non-persistent disk that I used in OpenNebula 1.4 is not
>> working in 2.0.
>>
>> The reason it worked with 1.4 is that it copied the directory as
>> it is without looking into the directory. My .vmx file was modified
>> to had a link to non-persistent disk and hence the solution was working.
>>
>> 2.0 specifically copies the vmdk file and then creates a deployment
>> file. And hence my 1.4 solution is not working with 2.0.
>>
>> My question is, can I tell opennebula to use specific image on
>> hypervisor, instead of making a copy of vmdk and using that as the
>> instance disk.
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Manish
>>
>> On 9/27/2010 5:02 PM, Manish Sapariya wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> I thought somebody will find this useful and hence
>> sharing it here.
>>
>> We are using opennebula based setup to test our
>> collaboration product. We have home grown test framework
>> which can run clients on different machines to execute
>> test scenarios. Things were fine until we had only few
>> users in our test. However as I added more users in test,
>> the VMs deploying started taking too long because of the
>> image copying. My frontend is on FC8, with big SATA disk.
>> The datastore is expored using CIFS. The VMWare Hypervisors
>> mount the datastore using CIFS to run the VMs.
>>
>> To minimize the copy of the whole disk on deploy, we
>> followed solution detailed in 1, which is briefly mentioned
>> as below.
>>
>> - Create your base image, call it basevm.
>> - Modify the disk settings to non-persistent.
>> - Now create another VM, clone1 , using the disk of
>>    basevm.
>>    - Set the new disk as non-persistent.
>> - Create the vm template pointing to clone1. Note that
>>    both the basevm and clone1 images should be in your
>>    exported datastore path.
>> - Deploy as many VMs as you like, with just few MBs of
>>    data to copied.
>>
>> Hope this helps somebody.
>>
>> 1. http://communities.vmware.com/thread/15339
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Manish
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20110301/4b4f2b24/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list